Methodic recommendations for measuring underwater noise of research and commercial vessels
https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2025-205-179-194
EDN: YOPAMO
Abstract
Recommendations for measuring underwater noise from vessels intended for fisheries researches and monitoring of bioresources are compiled based on current technical regulations and standards. Key terms and tools for the measurement are described, requirements for conditions of the measuring are determined, potential uncertainties of the data and procedures of the data recording and postprocessing are explained. The principles of placement, operation, and interaction are established for the main components of the hydroacoustic measurement system and the object of measurement. The sound pressure levels of noise emitted by vessel in the frequency range of 10–25,000 Hz in narrow and 1/3-octave frequency bands is measured. Parameters of the vessel movement along the track and distance to the registration point are monitored during the testing; the noise level is measured in the far acoustic field of the vessel and then normalized to a distance of 1 m. The sound pressure levels of noise are presented in dB relative to the reference sound pressure of 1 μPa. The measured noise levels are compared with the thresholds recommended by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). These thresholds represent the levels below which the effect of fish avoiding the vessel can be ignored. Frequency ranges and levels of the noise exceeding these limits are identified. These recommendations will be used as a component of the acceptance testing program for new research fishing vessels of Project 17050, as well as for acoustic certification of other vessels engaged in researches conducted by the Russian Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO) and its branches.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. Yu. KuznetsovRussian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Kuznetsov, Ph.D., head of laboratory
4, Shevchenko Alley, Vladivostok, 690091
V. I. Polyanichko
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Polyanichko, head of sector
4, Shevchenko Alley, Vladivostok, 690091
I. A. Ubarchuk
Russian Federation
Igor A. Ubarchuk, chief specialist
4, Shevchenko Alley, Vladivostok, 690091
V. I. Shevtsov
Russian Federation
Vasily I. Shevtsov, leading specialist
4, Shevchenko Alley, Vladivostok, 690091
References
1. Kuznetsov, M.Yu., Hydroacoustic methods and means of remote control of fish behavior in fishing, Vladivostok: Dalrybvtuz, 2007.
2. Kuznetsov, M.Yu., Hydroacoustic methods and tools for fish stock assessment and fishery maintenance. Part 1. Hydroacoustic tools and technologies of their use in bioresource researches of TINRO-center, Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanog., 2013, vol. 172, pp. 20–51.
3. Kuznetsov, M.Yu., Distance of certain fish species reaction to underwater noise from fishing and research vessels and admissible levels of the noise. Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanog., 2011, vol. 164, pp. 157–176.
4. Kuznetsov, M.Yu. and Vologdin, V.N., Hydroacoustic noise from fishing and research vessels and its influence on fish behaviour and fish stocks estimation (review and prospects of study), Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanog., 2009, vol. 157, pp. 334–355.
5. Kuznetsov, M.Yu., Polyanichko, V.I., Ubarchuk, I.A., and Syrovatkin, E.V., Influence of hydroacoustic noise from vessel on echo integration estimations of fish stocks and catchability of accounting trawl (on example of walleye pollock in the Okhotsk Sea), Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanog., 2017, vol. 190, pp. 85–100. doi 10.26428/1606-9919-2017-190-85-100. EDN: WQVHJB.
6. Kuznetsov, M.Yu., Shevtsov, V.I., and Polyanichko, V.I., Underwater noise characteristics of TINRO-Center’s reseach vessels, Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanog., 2014, vol. 177, pp. 235–256. doi 10.26428/1606-9919-2014-177-235-256
7. Kuznetsov, Yu.A., Kitlitsky, V.S., Fedoseenkov, V.S., and Shibkov, A.N., Methodology for studying hydroacoustic noises from fishing vessels, in Promyshlennoye rybolovstvo (Industrial fishing), Vladivostok: TINRO, 1979, vol. 9, pp. 86–90.
8. Levashov, D.E., Sovremennyye suda i sudovoye oborudovaniye dlya rybopromyslovykh issledovaniy (Modern vessels and ship equipment for fishery research), Moscow: VNIRO, 2010.
9. Levashov, D.E. and Bulanova, N.P., Some vessels for fishery research built in 2019–2020, Tr. Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2021, vol. 184, pp. 203−217. doi 10.36038/2307-3497-2021-184-203-217
10. Levashov, D.E. and Tatarnikov, V.A., Methodological aspects of acceptance tests for new industry research vessels based on domestic and foreign experience, in Mater. II Mezhdunar. nauchnoprakt. konf. “Rybokhozyaystvennyy kompleks Rossii: 300 let rossiyskoy akademicheskoy nauke” (Proc. II Int. Sci. Pract. Conf. “The fishery complex of Russia: 300 years of Russian academic science”), Moscow: VNIRO, 2024, pp. 493–500.
11. Tukiyanen, A.N., Teverovskiy, G.V., and Tsygankov, S.G., Noise measurements — relevant task, Sudostroyeniye, 2005, vol. 6(763), pp. 39–40.
12. Urik, R.J., Principles of underwater sound, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
13. De Robertis, A. and Handegard, N.O., Fish avoidance of research vessels and the efficacy of noise-reduced vessels: a review, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2013, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 34–45. doi 10.1093/icesjms/fss155
14. De Robertis, A. and Wilson, C.D., Walleye pollock respond to trawling vessels, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2006, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 514–522. doi 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.08.014
15. Kuznetsov, M.Y., Polyanichko, V.I., and Ubarchuk, I.A., The effects of vessel noise on walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) behavior, in Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life, Springer Nature Link, 2023, pp. 1–13. doi 10.1007/978-3-031-10417-6_86-1
16. McQuinn, I.H., A review of the effects of fish avoidance and other fish behaviours on acoustic target strength, special identification and biomass estimation, ICES FAST WG, St. John’s, Canada, 1999.
17. Ona, E. and Godø, O.R., Fish reaction to trawling noise: the significance for trawl sampling, Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Const. Int. Explor. Mer., 1990, vol. 189, pp. 159–166.
18. Ona, E., Godø, O.R., Handegard, N.O., Hjellvik, V., Patel, R., and Pedersen, G., Silent research vessels are not quiet, J. Acoustical Society of America, 2007, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 145–150. doi 10.1121/1.2710741
19. Vabø, R., Olsen, K., and Huse, I., The effect of vessel avoidance of wintering Norwegian spring spawning herring, Fish. Res., 2002, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 59–77. doi 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00360-5
20. Underwater noise of research vessels: review and recommendations, ICES Cooperative Research Report, Mitson, R.B., ed., 1995, no. 209. doi 10.17895/ices.pub.5317
21. Gosudarstvennaya sistema obespecheniya yedinstva izmereniy. Izmereniya gidroakusticheskiye (State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Hydroacoustic measurements. Terms and definitions), Moscow: Gosstandart of Russia, 2004.
22. Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Underwater Sound from Ships. Part 1: General Requirements, American National Standard ANSI/ASA S12.64-2009/Part 1, Melville, NY, 2009.
23. https://www.bksv.com. Cited November, 2024.
24. https://zetlab.com. Cited November, 2024.
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov M.Yu., Polyanichko V.I., Ubarchuk I.A., Shevtsov V.I. Methodic recommendations for measuring underwater noise of research and commercial vessels. Izvestiya TINRO. 2025;205(1):179-194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2025-205-179-194. EDN: YOPAMO