Preview

Izvestiya TINRO

Advanced search

Comparative analysis on distribution of common cetacean and fish species in the Barents Sea

https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2021-201-755-764

Abstract

Comparative analysis of cetacean and fish species distribution in the Barents Sea is conducted on the data of joint Russian-Norwegian ecosystem surveys in August-October of 2005–2014. The number of observed minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), white-beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchus albirostris), and harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), as well as the acousticmeasured distribution density of fishes, as capelin (Mallotus villosus), polar cod (Boreogadus saida), herring (Clupea sp.), cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens), blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassoumes), redfish (Sebastes sp.), norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii), and fish fingerlings are summarized by the squares 50 x 50 km and maps of their distribution are drawn. A degree of overlapping between distributions of cetacean and fish species is estimated for each pair of species, as ratio of number of the squares where the species were presented together to total number of the squares where the species were found. Associations between cetaceans and their potential prey are determined by the methods of principal components and correlation analysis applied to the log-transformed data. Distribution of the widely distributed cetaceans, as minke whale and white-beaked dolphin, overlapped largely (up to 42 %) with many of studied fish species, therefore their possible predation on these species was significant. On the contrary, locally distributed cetaceans, such as harbor porpoise, had possibly lesser impact on fish because of low overlapping with their distribution (< 11 %). By the results of correlation analysis, capelin and polar cod were the priority potential prey for baleen whales (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), whereas cod, haddock, blue whiting, and redfish – for toothed whales (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.02, and < 0.01, respectively), in particular for white-beaked dolphin.

About the Authors

R. N. Klepikovskiy
Polar branch of VNIRO (PINRO)
Russian Federation

Klepikovskiy Roman N., senior specialist

6, Academik Knipovich Street, Murmansk, 183038



V. А. Ivshin
Polar branch of VNIRO (PINRO)
Russian Federation

Ivshin Viktor A., Ph.D., senior researcher

6, Academik Knipovich Street, Murmansk, 183038



A. G. Trofimov
Polar branch of VNIRO (PINRO)
Russian Federation

Trofimov Alexander G., Ph.D., leading researcher

6, Academik Knipovich Street, Murmansk, 183038



References

1. Atlas morskikh mlekopitayushchikh SSSR (Atlas of Marine Mammals of the USSR), Zemsky, V.A., ed., Moscow: Pishchevaya Promyshlennost’, 1980.

2. Eliseeva, I.I. and Yuzbashev, M.M., General theory of statistics, Eliseeva, I.I., ed., 5th ed., rev. and add., Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 2004.

3. A study of ecosystems in fishery water areas, collection and processing of data on aquatic biological resources, and techniques and technology for their harvesting and processing, in Instruktsii i metodicheskie rekomendatsii po sboru i obrabotke biologicheskoi informatsii v moryakh Evropeiskogo Severa i Severnoi Atlantiki (Instructions and Methodical Recommendations for the Collection and Processing of Biological Information in the Seas of the European North and North Atlantic), Shevelev, M.S., ed., Moscow: VNIRO, 2004, 2nd ed., no. 1.

4. Korosov, A.V. and Gorbach, V.V., Komp’yuternaya obrabotka biologicheskikh dannykh (Computer processing of biological data), Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo PetrGU, 2017.

5. Trofimov, A.G., Karsakov, A.L., and Ivshin, V.A., Climate changes in the Barents Sea over the last half century, Tr. Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2018, vol. 173, pp. 79–91.

6. Filin, A.A., An approach to the management of the exploitation of fish resources in the Barents Sea taking into account the nutritional needs of marine mammals, in Tezisy dokl. 2 mezhdunar. konf. “Morskiye mlekopitayushchiye Golarktiki” (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. “Marine Mammals of the Holarctic”), Moscow, 2002, pp. 267–268.

7. Aguilar A. Fin Whale: Balaenoptera physalus // Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. — 2 ed. — 2009. — P. 433–437. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-373553-9.00102-4.

8. Bjørge A.J., Tolley K.A. Harbou Porpoise: Phocoena phocoena // Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. — 2 ed. — 2009. — P. 530–533. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-373553-9.00125-5.

9. Bjørge A.J., Øien N. Distribution and abundance of harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, in Norwegian waters // Report of the International Whaling Commission. — 1995. — Spec. Iss. 16. — P. 89–98.

10. Bowen W.D. Role of marine mammals in aquatic ecosystems // Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. — 1997. — Vol. 158. — P. 267–274.

11. Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. et al. Introduction to Distance Sampling. — N.Y. : Oxford Univ. Press, 2001. — 432 p.

12. Buckland S.T., Turnock B.J. A robust line transect method // Biometrics. — 1992. — Vol. 48(3). — P. 901–909.

13. Fall J., Skern-Mauritzen M. White-beaked dolphin distribution and association with prey in the Barents Sea // Mar. Biol. Res. — 2014. — Vol. 10, Iss. 10. — P. 957–971. DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2013.872796.

14. Hain J.H.W., Carter G.R., Kraus S.D. et al. Feeding behaviour of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, in the western North Atlantic // Fish. Bull. — 1982. — Vol. 80, № 2. — P. 259–268.

15. Haug T., Bjørge A., Øien N. et al. Marine mammals of the Barents Sea // The Barents Sea: ecosystem, resources, management: Half a century of Russian-Norwegian cooperation. — Trondheim : Tapir Academic Press, 2011. — P. 395–430.

16. Kinze C.C. White-beaked dolphin Lagenorhynchus albirostris // Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. — San Diego : Academic Press, 2002. — P. 94–99.

17. Kovacs K., Haug T., Lydersen C. Marine Mammals of the Barents Sea // Ecosystem Barents Sea. — Trondheim : Tapir Academic Press, 2009. — P. 453–496.

18. Larsen A.H., Sigurjonsson J., Øien N. at al. Populations genetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial loci in skin biopsies collected from central and northeastern North Atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae): population identity and migratory destinations // Proc. Biol. Sci. — 1996. — Vol. 263. — P. 1611–1618. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0236.

19. Øien N. A note on Lagenorhynchus species in Norwegian waters : ICES Study Group on Seals and Small Cetaceans in European Seas. — 1993. — 9 p.

20. Øien N. Distribution and abundance of large whales in Norwegian and adjacent waters based on ship surveys 1995–2001 // NAMMCO Sci. Publ. — 2009. — Vol. 7. — P. 31–47. DOI: 10.7557/3.2704.

21. Øien N., Klepikovskiy R.N. Marine mammals // Working Group on the Integrated Assessments of the Barents Sea (WGIBAR). ICES Scientific Reports. — 2020. — Vol. 2, Iss. 30. — P. 117–120.

22. Skaug H.J., Øien N.I., Schweder T., Bøthun G. Abundance of minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) in the Northeastern Atlantic // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. — 2004. — Vol. 61, № 6. — P. 870–886. DOI: 10.1139/f04-020.

23. Skern-Mauritzen M., Johannesen E., Bjørge A., Øien N.I. Baleen whale distributions and prey associations in the Barents Sea // Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. — 2011. — Vol. 426. — P. 289–301. DOI: 10.3354/meps09027.

24. Stewart B.S., Leatherwood S. Minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata Lacepede, 1804 // Handbook of Marine Mammals. — San Diego : Academic Press, 1985. — Vol. 3. — P. 91–136.

25. Wassmann P., Reigstad M., Haug T. et al. Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea // Progr. Oceanogr. — 2006. — Vol. 71, Iss. 2–4. — P. 232–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003.


Review

For citations:


Klepikovskiy R.N., Ivshin V.А., Trofimov A.G. Comparative analysis on distribution of common cetacean and fish species in the Barents Sea. Izvestiya TINRO. 2021;201(4):755-764. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2021-201-755-764

Views: 410


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1606-9919 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5510 (Online)